It’s worth noting that beyond just the question of how the bridge will be funded, many of these publications are questioning whether without mass transit the costs of this project will now outweigh the benefits. For instance, the Nyack Villager says “The proposed bridge will tear down many of our neighbors’ homes, place nearby condos in the shadow of a giant bridge and still not solve our traffic problem.”

Newsday goes further with an insightful op-ed from Nicholas Dagen Bloom who writes “In both these counties, many citizens and most politicians realize that what seemed like outlandish planning concepts 20 years ago — mixed-use office parks or bus rapid transit — could be useful in building suburban affluence and stability in the future. The quick buck from the subdivision or highway contract are no longer the game in a highly regulated and increasingly complex suburban empire. Even the office park developers talk about mixed use these days. The state’s now discarded planning process for bus rapid transit on the Tappan Zee Bridge replacement was popular locally because it was going to help reshape Westchester and Rockland’s downtowns and office parks for the 21st century by making them more dense and walkable. The same cannot be said for the exclusive automobile/truck replacement bridge — it only moves vehicles faster, rather than represent long-term community planning.”

“Can anyone truly believe that five or 10 years from now — when this bridge is finally done, the construction workers have gone home, drivers are paying $12-15 tolls, gas costs $7 a gallon, and the congestion is no better on Interstate 287 — that the massive new Tappan Zee Crossing will be seen as anything but a white elephant?”

Tri-State Transportation Campaign’s associate director clarifies in her recent op-ed that transit supporters are not against the new bridge. On the contrary, they believe the region has much more to gain, including on the  jobs front both during construction and after if transit is a part of the project.

Bloom’s piece and several others serve as valuable reminders that if the original choices where to fix the bridge or build a new one without transit, residents might have opted for the first option, which would have been cheaper, and less disruptive to local communities. Residents and their elected officials wanted a new bridge because it came with the promise of mass transit, and with it possibilities for reduced congestion, more walkable communities and economic development in local downtowns. That’s the real bridge to more jobs and higher quality of life in the region.

Thruway Authority executive director Thomas Madison was quoted in March as saying “A big piece of what we hope will be the funding plan for the new Tappan Zee Bridge is to get a long-term, low-interest loan.” This latest development puts a new wrinkle in the Governor’s plan to expedite the project.

According to a spokesman from the U.S. Department of Transportation, “The TIFIA loan program is an ongoing process and the Tappan Zee bridge is one of the high priority infrastructure projects from around the country that has been chosen for expedited permitting and environmental reviews. We are currently compiling a reserve list of projects, including the Tappan Zee Bridge, that will be expedited if TIFIA receives more funding, but this depends on Congress providing the money. We are hopeful that Congress will provide additional funding. We also are encouraging applicants to reapply in the fall.”

Kate Slevin, Executive Director of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign said in a statement that this delay in financing “provides a great opportunity for the state to improve the project by including bus rapid transit. With bus rapid transit, the Tappan Zee Bridge project will be better for the environment, create more jobs, and be better positioned for future federal loans.”

Read the group’s full comments.

Riverkeeper has also issued its own comments which point out several additional environmental and legal issues with the State’s DEIS.

Read Riverkeeper’s comments on the Tappan Zee DEIS.

The comments have created a buzz in the press but still no word on how the State will react.

The APA NY Metro calls on the State and FHWA to provide “at a minimum…priority access for commuter buses between the existing Palisades Center Park & Ride facility and the Metro-North Tarrytown station. Moving from west to east, this should include: 1) priority access from the bridge landing in Nyack to the Palisades Center 2) use of the “emergency access lane” on the bridge for bus operations, and 3) an access ramp from the new bridge down to the Tarrytown Station.” These short-term improvements would provide a foundation for a future, robust bus rapid transit (BRT) system that would serve both Rockland and Westchester.

Their comments go on to criticize the DEIS’s financial assumptions about the Tappan Zee project. APA NY Metro suggests that a “whole cost approach” would be more appropriate, taking into account the costs of adding transit at a later date, as opposed to in concert with the construction, and the costs of transit vehicle delays in the interim. APA NY Metro, like several other groups, is questioning the  “significantly higher than industry standard” costs that the state is citing for the BRT system and calls for a “detailed, itemized breakdown of the cost estimate.”

They also request that the state and FHWA substantiate the claims of the DEIS that this project will “improve mobility and reduce congestion” even without transit options, and question whether the project conforms with the State’s Smart Growth Public Policy Infrastructure Act.

In closing APA NY Metro urges the State and FWHA to reinstate provisions for commuter rail or BRT. Read their full comments.

Tarrytown and New Rochelle recently joined the growing ranks of municipalities including Yonkers, Dobbs Ferry, Wesley Hills, Greenburgh, Hastings-on-Hudson and Croton-on-Hudson, as well as the North Westchester Energy Action Consortium (members shown in blue) in passing resolutions in support of transit in the Tappan Zee project.

While the State moves forward with pile driving tests for the new Tappan Zee Bridge and the State Thruway Authority Director waxes elegant about the project, another two Westchester towns have passed resolutions calling on the state and federal government to restore mass transit to the Tappan Zee project. Orange County Executive Diana has also come out strongly in support of transit.

Tarrytown, the eastern terminus of the Tappan Zee, and New Rochelle joined the growing ranks of municipalities including Yonkers, Dobbs Ferry, Wesley Hills, Greenburgh, Hastings-on-Hudson and Croton-on-Hudson, as well as the North Westchester Energy Action Consortium that are calling for a 21^st century bridge.

Orange County Executive Diana is adding his county’s voice in support of transit on the Tappan Zee. At a forum hosted by Congresswoman Nan Hayworth, the County Executive called current plans for a new Tappan Zee bridge foolish, and asked the Congresswoman to help convince the Governor to put mass transit back into the project.

The fact that Orange County, along with New Rochelle and Yonkers, two of Westchester’s largest cities, are calling for transit is particularly significant. Though these areas will not be directly impacted by the project’s construction, their leaders recognize the importance of including transit in this project to form a strong foundation for a system to address the region’s mobility needs both now and in the future.

State Senator John Bonacic has also written to Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos endorsing the inclusion of bus rapid transit as part of the Tappan Zee project and encouraging the Majority Leader to include this position in the state’s final budget.

The State is accepting public comments on the project’s Draft Environmental Impact Statement until March 30^th, they can be e-mailed to: tzbsite@dot.state.ny.us.

Groups including Riverkeeper and elected officials including Nyack Mayor Jen Laird White had called for more time for the project’s review.

The state and the Federal Highway Administration both indicated that it will still take them until at least the beginning of April to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests submitted in regards to their transit and financial analyses in the DEIS.

Meanwhile the state has already begun drilling to collect test samples of river rock and soil to prepare for the new bridge.

Comments can be emailed to  tzbsite@dot.state.ny.us or mailed to:

Michael P. Anderson
Project Director
New York State Dept. of Transportation
4 Burnett Boulevard
Poughkeepsie, New York 12603
Telephone: 877-892-3685

Tri-State Transportation Campaign blogs “the state must respond to their comments, [as well as the ones it receives in writing and via e-mail at tzbsite@dot.state.ny.us] in its Final Environmental Impact Statement. With frustration growing about the DEIS’ unsubstantiated projected transit costs, insufficient alternatives analysis, incomplete environmental review, and brief public comment period, New York has a lot of explaining to do.”

After the hearings Newsday published an op-ed calling for transit to be restore to this project saying “Transit has been a part of bridge planning for years, and when state transportation planners produced the new proposal without it, criticism erupted on every side, including from environmentalists and local officials. Better public transit across the span would give commuters from Rockland County better access to Metro-North trains and employment east of the river without boosting the number of cars pouring into Westchester.”

Read on for highlights from the public testimony and the press coverage of the hearings last week.

Westchester County Executive Astorino reinforced his staunch support of designing and building a bridge that accommodates transit. Otherwise, he said, “we may be building a scenic parking lot over the Hudson River.”

New York State Assemblymember Amy Paulin, who represents parts of Westchester, said that the “state never saves money by putting off an essential expense.

Westchester County Legislator MaryJane Shimsky, whose district includes several riverfront towns, indicated that the state must find the money to build transit on the bridge now in order to take advantage of today’s construction costs and low interest rates. Legislator Shimsky represents Hastings-on-Hudson, Dobbs Ferry, and Greenburgh, all of which passed resolutions in support of transit on the Tappan Zee.

Westchester County Legislator Alfreda Williams, whose district encompasses Tarrytown and Sleepy Hollow in the Tappan Zee footprint, said that it is “deplorable…to not include bus rapid transit in this day.” Even adding it later, she said, would subject residents to four or five more years of air, soil, and noise pollution.

Tarrytown Mayor Drew Fixell expressed his disappointment at the state’s choice to move forward with a new bridge without transit.

Rockland County Executive C. Scott Vanderhoef called for short-term transit improvements that could be created while the state continues to plan for BRT or commuter rail “Why not plan now for our TZx buses by using the emergency access lanes on the new bridge as bus lanes, and by connecting the emergency lanes to the travel lanes at the landings? It’s feasible and it makes sense, and will at least give us one immediate way to get people out of cars and to move people faster.”

Harriet Cornell, Chairwoman of the Rockland County Legislature said that the state must restore the public’s trust in this project by “announcing a timetable for recommencing the planning process for mass transit and the corridor improvements. The agency responsible for shepherding this process should be identified. And the Thruway Authority, DOT and its partner agencies must publicly commit to seek funding for construction of mass transit in the future.”

Nyack Mayor Jen Laird-White raised concerns about the project’s financing as well as the lack of transit “The governor this week stated that tolls would be the main source of funds for the bridge. All of these facts are enough to make commuters quite uncomfortable. Nine dollars will be difficult for those who use the bridge daily to get to work. Thirty dollars, without a reliable public transportation option, will make it impossible.”

State Senator David Carlucci thanked Cuomo for fast tracking the project but called on the governor to create a dedicated express bus lane immediately and plan for “full transit capability” as part of the project. And White Plans City Councilwoman Lecuona declared that a bridge without transit was “planning for yesterday.”

Advocacy organizations including the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, Riverkeeper, New York League of Conservation Voters and Scenic Hudson all also weighed in in support of transit.

Press coverage of the hearings:

• Tappan Zee Public Hearing Dominated by Calls for Transit, Mobilizing the Region
• Make room on new Tappan Zee for bus rapid transit Newsday
• Westchester exec Astorino, residents call for mass transit on new Tappan Zee Bridge, Journal News
• Tappan Zee Priorities Rockland County Times
• Put Transit On New Tappan Zee Bridge Hartford Courant
• Transit, Jobs, Construction Noise: Rockland Residents Air Worries About Swiftly Approaching Tappan Zee Bridge Project  WNYC
• Rockland Concerned With Tappan Zee Bridge Study The Daily
• New Tappan Zee Bridge needs bus transit

While the state held the first of two public hearings on the TZB draft environmental impact statements in Rockland, Westchester cities and towns were busy taking action on the project.  Last night three Westchester municipalities joined the growing ranks of communities calling for transit on the Tappan Zee. Yonkers, Dobbs Ferry and Greenburgh all passed resolutions asking “Governor Cuomo, the New York State Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Authority to restore dedicated public transportation infrastructure to its long-held place in any and all plans for the replacement of the Tappan Zee Bridge.”

Both the Dobbs Ferry and Yonkers votes were unanimous. In Dobbs Ferry the Mayor and town trustees spoke passionately about the need for transit to protect the quality of life in their village and provide ways for future generations to get around. Trustee Donna Cassell pointed out that unless the Governor dedicates the emergency access lanes on the bridge to buses now, there’s the potential to open them up to motor vehicles in the future, and these vehicles would spill over to local roads, overwhelming the peaceful streets of Dobbs Ferry.

The resolutions, similar to the ones passed by Hastings-on-Hudson and Croton-on-Hudson also calls on other communities to “let their opinion be known to Governor Cuomo and the relevant agencies and representatives New York State and the federal government on this critical decision that will impact quality of life for decades to come.”

View the Greenburgh, Croton, Hastings-on-Hudson and Yonkers resolutions (all are pdfs).

Now the Construction Industry Council is suggesting that mass transit is not justified in the I-287 Corridor. We take a look at some of the claims made on their site replacethetzbridgenow.org and whether or not they hold up…

1) No Source Cited (but is seems likely that many of the numbers come from this blog which also gives no citations: http://community.machinedesign.com/forums/thread/29840.aspx)
2) DEIS pg. 4-4.
3) All study documents created for Tappan Zee Bridge/I-287 Environmental Review. http://www.tzbsite.com/tzb-library/study-documents/study-documents-index.html
4) American Public Media, Home Buyers moving closer to transit, http://www.marketplace.org/topics/life/transportation-nation/home-buyers-are-moving-closer-public-transit (Feb. 24, 2011).
5 Urban Land Institute, Demographic Changes Mean Dramatic Shifts In Demand for California Housing: ULI Report Finds Imbalance Between Consumer Preferences and Existing Stock, Urban Land Institute